MORNINGS AND MOOS

Sometimes I post about other animals in our “farm collective”, the group of creatures who share our environment on this farm.  Today, I want to get around to telling you about Mocha, although it’s a bit early for her birthday.

The weekend was pleasant, even reaching the 60s on Sunday.  Banner got to go out for “ice cream” – twice!  So it was a very good weekend from her perspective.  The frozen custard shop has had new owners for a couple of years.  It was delicious from the beginning, and the sundaes now are even better.  Plus, it is always better when the weather is warm.  Banner gets excited and by the time we pull into the drive-thru lane, she is looking at the window, where the good stuff comes out.  Parker used to get excited about this place so that he would jump into a full-body point as we drove by.  We didn’t stop nearly as often as he would have preferred.

At home, I was sitting at the workstation near the patio door when movement caught my eye.  At 10:30 in the morning, “Henry” was trotting down the drive toward the barn.  Our nephew named the resident possum at his home “Gary”, so this one, who has been living in the barn for a very long time, getting fat on cat food, needed his own name.  Henry’s coat looks rough, but his gait was that of a youngster.  He was much taller than I would have expected, and he was gaiting with his mouth open.  I suppose that even possums with a heavy coat get too warm in the 60s.  He was displaying some fearsome teeth, and he seemed to be in a hurry.  Since possums are, at least hypothetically, nocturnal, Henry must be one of those stay-up-late kind.  Perhaps he partied too far from home and didn’t leave himself enough time to get back.  I used to do that as a kid when I was out with friends riding horses.

Mocha is in the pasture on the other side of the drive from Henry.  She’s a darling girl, all 1400+ pounds of her.  Mocha was born on March 13, 2003 to a very old mother.  We had bought a small herd of cattle, and her “heavily-bred” mother was in the group.  We kept her mom in the barn near the house, and she was down for a while before Mocha was born.  “Goldie” was much too old to have been bred, and she couldn’t go with the herd across the pastures after Mocha was born.  Goldie became the first “retiree” to be kept on the farm.  And for an old girl, she had a good sense of humor and a very direct way of engaging with you when she wanted something.  Her technique was unmistakable.  She would look directly at you with intensity.  Perhaps cows also believe in telepathy.

Mocha uses this same method of communicating, but combined with a deep, low bellow.  She and most of her offspring have this easily identifiable voice that sounds like the horn of an ocean-liner.  And she and I are buds, so she expects me to listen.  We became buds when she was old enough to go out with the herd but smart enough not to come back in the evenings on her own.  I would walk across the pasture in the late afternoon calling for her, and as soon as she saw me, she would come running toward me and we would go back to the barn where she could get a full tummy from mom.

Goldie reached her late 20s, and she died from slipping down an embankment to the creek in deep snow, not due to illness or “old age”.  “19” was the next retiree, and another personality.  Mocha was retired about a year and a half ago, and she and 19 became pasture buddies.  The old ones are attended to, receiving more grooming from others than being the groomer.  In the past couple of winters, 19 was struggling.  This winter was her last.  She was in her early 20s.  The next retiree is Mocha’s First Daughter, Rosa.  I was there when Rosa was born.  Rosa is a lot like her mom, and she and the replacement heifers and her calf have been staying in the east pasture this winter with Mocha.

Kids need socialization, and Sunday was the date for the bull to be rotated back to the bull-pen, so the rest of the herd was put back together with the thought that Mocha could be fed without competition.  That clearly wasn’t going to work.  Mocha has some difficulty moving already, but once the others were moved to the barn for treatment, she began pacing from one gate to another, calling out in her foghorn voice.  So the “kid” and Rosa were put back into the east pasture with Mocha.  He has been doted on by his mother and grand-mother, so he won’t lack attention, and he won’t miss being picked on by that rascally heifer, who will be getting her due by those bigger than her.

So by the close of the day, all was at peace again on the farm.  Humans went to bed early, and Banner began snoring before we went to sleep.  It was a good day.

Digiprove sealCopyright secured by Digiprove © 2020
Posted in Everyday, Life in the Ozarks | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

DE-ICING – YOUR STEPS, YOUR SIDEWALK, YOUR ROAD

A re-purposing has been found for fracking waste, and it has been widely re-distributed already as de-icing material:

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/oil-gas-fracking-radioactive-investigation-937389/

Living not far from a mining area, when we drilled for a new well last year, it was a lesson in geology. We have a shallower well that tests clear for lead, but the new well initially had a high level of lead and cadmium. Other contaminants were not tested; lead is typically the higher level of toxic heavy metals in this area and it was used as the marker for whether the well casing was properly sealed. There is a shale level between the two aquifers in our area, and that shale level must be sealed from the lower aquifer for all new wells. The State maintains a map of well depth requirements that are based on where the shale is located. If there is a problem with the seal, water can carry down heavy metals from the area of contamination. So each new well must be certified by the State based on test results. When the initial samples showed that the contamination was not decreasing, a dye study revealed a problem with the integrity of the seal. So the well had to be re-drilled, and a camera used to identify the best place to install the seal. The new well has now been certified, but given that this property is close to a mining area and contamination has occurred, we installed an RO system for water for humans and Newfs.

The lesson in the areas of distribution of heavy metals makes the issues addressed in the article on de-icing materials clear, easy to recognize.

It also makes me wonder about an issue I’ve noticed with the Newfs since we have been here. All of the roads in this area are paved, which is convenient and nice for transportation needs. Our drive is gravel, for three reasons: asphalt contains a lot of toxic materials that our Newfs would otherwise walk on, gravel is a better footing for a Newf when walking, and gravel allows rainwater to follow a natural path. Too much concrete and asphalt reduces the efficiency of natural filtering. Plus, concrete and asphalt retain heat, which isn’t an asset for most of the year.

In general, I am strongly in favor of reclamation – Re-purpose, Re-use, Re-cycle, and first: Reduce. Materials that can’t be recycled safely and those that do not have a recycling option are low on my list of priorities. We can’t live sustainably until we figure out the whole process. Dumping on land, in air or in oceans is simply not a survivable option. The key issue in this case is safety.

For a long time, I walked the Newfs on the road for exercise. Walking on our property, which has a lot of trees and wildlife, means that the dogs pick up ticks. But one after one, I found that at some point they resisted wanting to go onto the road. I assumed it was heat from the road in summer initially, or fear of passing vehicles. But it continued during winter. Whenever de-icing material was applied, I would wait for rain before taking them onto the road again, thinking the salt was irritating their pads or the skin between their pads. Three Newfs associated something about walking on the road with a negative consequence. The first of those three developed sores on his feet, which he exacerbated by licking. Those sores turned out to be cancerous. The second one tended to have lack of immunity to health issues. Now the third one has a couple of de-pigmented spots, and she had begun licking her feet also. Last year I quit taking her onto the road for walks. Any of these three Newfs could have experienced these issues for reasons not related to the application of de-icing material, or their health status may have been additionally taxed by the de-icing materials.

The problem with re-purposing fracking waste is the variety of toxic materials present in that waste, and heavy metals such as lead, cadmium and arsenic will accumulate, on the roadsides if not in the asphalt. Contaminants present and levels will depend on the area where the mining occurred. The process of flushing out methane gas also flushes out contaminants. The same would be true for liquid de-icing materials applied to drives, sidewalks or steps. Without clearly identifying the material on the label, it is not possible to select a liquid product that is genuinely “pet-safe”.

Rock salt or sand would be a much more innocuous product to use for de-icing or slip resistance. A rug at a landing for steps will remove a lot of sand from Newf feet. Rock salt is also mined, as is table salt, but table salt must meet food safety requirements. Rock salt can have some naturally occurring contaminants, depending on the area where it was mined. Below is an article from a Pennsylvania study that includes test results for radioactive isotopes in rock salt, but does not provide comparison results for these isotopes in other salt sources. It discusses the differences between brine from traditional drilling for oil and gas, which has been used for many years, and brine from fracking:

http://files.dep.state.pa.us/water/Wastewater%20Management/WastewaterPortalFiles/Rock%20Salt%20Paper%20final%20052711.pdf

Keep your yards safe. Some contaminants accumulate and cannot be removed. Use more innocuous products when there are options.

Digiprove sealCopyright secured by Digiprove © 2020
Posted in Exercise, Health & Safety | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BLAME IT ON THE DOG?

Our new kitchen range is very nice, stainless with a double oven. Our previous one served us for about 17 years. So we have 17 years of habit, or motor memory. Wonder if old dogs learn new tricks better than humans.

When we chose this range, we were aware that with controls at the front instead of on the rear panel, there were reported risks of dogs jumping onto the range and turning the burners on. This wasn’t optimal, but we otherwise liked this range. Banner wouldn’t jump on the front of the range, and we knew that when another puppy came along, this would require a high level of attention.

This range, like our previous one, is electric with a glass top. It has an additional “warming zone” burner in the center. We knew that we would need to be careful, but not having to reach across a hot burner didn’t seem bad.

Nearly six months later, we are getting better at forming new habits, since the position of the controls is opposite, as well as being on the front. Plus, the controls turn easily, with little of a “click” to secure the knob to its closed position. One new habit, for example, is that when you reach above to clean the microwave, you need to immediately afterward turn off the warming zone burner.

Now I am left to wonder: how many dogs have been maligned as the cause of human error? Also wondering how long it will take for design engineers to develop a more secure remotely located panel. Maybe it is time for fire departments and the NFPA to collaborate with design engineers who work for appliance manufacturers. The number one topic on my list would be a universal arrangement of knobs relative to the burner positions. Next would be a sufficiently deliberate engagement or disengagement of the locked position and the control panel location.

Digiprove sealCopyright secured by Digiprove © 2020
Posted in Health & Safety, Home Accomodations | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

SHE’S A “REAL GIRL”

On our many walks we encounter a lot of People.  People encounter a Newf.  And, this often leads to discourse.  What kind of dog is “he”?  How much does he eat?  How much does he weigh?  How much does he cost?  Does he shed?  Slobber?  All of these criteria are important of course to someone considering bringing a dog into their environment.  Several important questions are regularly omitted, except on rare occasion.

First of all, he is a “she”, and yes she slobbers, sheds and eats like a teenager.  And she costs a lot, more in terms of after you bring one home.  She is close to her ideal weight, occasionally a little over, and yes her coat makes her look much bigger.  Exercise and diet, along with genetics, are crucial to maintaining the health of a big dog.

Banner thoroughly enjoys her encounters with Newf-friendly people, and she usually has questions of her own, beginning with “What’s that smell?”  Dogs use scent, posture and expression for communication before words.  Banner also uses “words”, more than most Newfs we’ve known, sometimes liberally and sometimes conservatively, and sometimes I suspect she is making up her own words, but she usually gets her point(s) across.  She also uses posture and facial expression.

Can I pet her?

Most people ask first, and that is always appreciated.  Sometimes they ask as they begin diving in for a close-up, sometimes as a group.  Often people tend to expect Newfs to love kids as though all should be like the babysitter in Peter Pan (Nana) or an animation puppy, and most Newfs are very friendly.  Most Newf puppies interact and easily develop relationships, and sometimes they see kids as playmates (and kids aren’t always as vigorous).  Sometimes the kids aren’t as interested as the parents visualize, so the person interacting may be the parent instead of the kid.  Sometimes there is the kid or young adult who does a promotional act, usually including a high-pitched, “Ohhh, she’s soooo cuuuute!”  That tactic may encourage some viewers, but to Banner, it can be off-putting.  She will be tolerant and polite, even if the shrill sound is painful, but in these encounters, she quickly loses interest in interacting.  I suspect that Newfs can smell a faker easily.

It’s always good to ask first about petting. Clearly some people that approach have been in a class or have watched a program or video where someone has offered training on how to approach a strange dog. One of the clues is that they approach with their hand out-stretched to let the dog smell.  Sometimes people approach in a don’t-hurt-me posture and very tentatively offer their hand, even crouching. Sometimes people will thrust their hand in a dog’s face without gauging the dog’s reaction, and sometimes while telling me what they are doing and why without hesitating for a breath. These are ways to suggest to the dog that you are not an engaged human, and this could lead to an unexpected reaction from another dog who is less tolerant.

The human should begin by asking the dog’s handler if the dog can be petted, without rushing. With the handler’s consent, the next question should *always* be directed to the dog:  the person should gauge whether the dog is interested in being petted.

Dogs are not made of wood.  They have minds, personalities, idiosyncrasies and preferences.  A well-socialized dog handles these different interactions well, and an experienced handler will be judicious with consent when that is appropriate, but there is definitely a human component to the interactions.  So, ask the dog, even if the handler says it is OK.

Digiprove sealCopyright secured by Digiprove © 2019-2023
Posted in Communications - a two-way art, Training | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment